New Report on an Old Story: Can Santa Cruz Learn from Yale Law School?

NOTES BY NORSE:  Yale Law School eggheads and privileged pundits are just now getting around to acknowledging the basics.  This is what poor people have known for centuries, Santa Cruz HUFF activists raged about for decades, and the National Law Center for Homelessness and Poverty has been issuing reports on year-after-year–the outrageous, cruel, hypocritical, and oblivious treatment of those outside.

Meanwhile in Santa Cruz a wet cold winter is upon us replete with buffed up Park Ranger Bullies and Surveillance Cameras passed to the tune of $200,000+ [item #16 on last Tuesday’s Council agenda]  No City Council emergency funding being released to deal with the long-declared Shelter Emergency.  Nary a peep of protest from the local ACLU or the recycled “Brand New Council” electeds Krohn and S. Brown.  Not a word from Trump-panicked protesters who surprisingly appeared en masse showed up at City Council Tuesday.  Little more than the thin promise of “more money down the road” from out-going City Council still presided over by the newly-elected “Two Minute” Mathews.  After nearly two months, the “no time for public comment” Mayor has still not responded to simple requests for itemizing funding allegedly being spent on homeless services.

The City Council has snubbed community activist Warming Center initiatives and proceeded to paper over the pain by assigning the ill-prepared and miniscule Association of Faith Communities with no formal input from the unhoused community that the 50-person shelter throughout December is funded to serve.

Meanwhile Kevin Vogel’s SCPD continues to stonewall in the face of subdued but persistent community outrage against the murder of Sean Arlt, refusing to release audio, video, and killer officer name, much less file charges against the shooter(s) for manslaughter (at the very least).  And even the bright-and-shiny 21st Century policing posturing Sheriff’s Department headed by Jim Hart is only releasing partial video of its latest gundown of 4″-knife wielding Luke Smith in the sacred name of “officer safety”.  Unable to jacket Smith with a criminal history, the spinmeisters are bemoaning “mental illness” as their latest excuse for institutionalized police brutality–a new scapegoat to cover up the same old juggernaut.  And the community is supposed to heal instead of bringing the uniformed criminals to justice.

City Manager Martin Bernal continues to stall on releasing Public Records documenting the surveillance devices placed, funded, and regularly used by city authorities with no local Snowden or Manning to raise the issue.   Records demanded a year ago to investigate claims of race and class profiling and harassment are still tightly withheld by subordinates.

Next Saturday December 3rd, Community Control of Police advocates will be gathering at the Town Clock at 1:30 PM to demand the release of records and action to hold shooters accountable.

And harassment of RV dwellers sheltering themselves against blistering winter weather continues in the Coastal zone of the City and County.  This in spite of the Coastal Commission’s August decision turning down “Squeeze ’em Out” Scott Collins’ RV ban.  While the local Coastal Commission staff is “investigating” the County’s unlawful issuing of citations to those whose only shelter is their RV, the staff acknowledges it is actually working to do what it did with City officials–find a way to legally ban RV’s at night so as to drive the poor away.

Criminalizing the poor and covering over the crimes of those who get paid to who do so is still business-as-usual in Santa Cruz.


Thursday, November 17, 2016

Report Documents the Criminalization of Homelessness

The Allard K. Lowenstein International Human Rights Clinic at Yale Law School has released a new report titled “Forced into Breaking the Law”: The Criminalization of Homelessness in Connecticut. The report examines how Connecticut’s homeless residents face the threat of criminal sanctions for simply existing. The report also documents how Connecticut city ordinances, such as those prohibiting loitering, panhandling, and sleeping in public, punish people for performing necessary, life-sustaining functions, which effectively criminalizes homelessness itself. It further outlines how the criminalization of homelessness violates state, federal, and international law.

The release of the report coincides with National Hunger and Homelessness Awareness Week and the launch of the national “Housing Not Handcuffs” campaign, organized by National Coalition for the Homeless and the National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty, which aims to end the criminalization of homelessness.

“Laws criminalizing activities that people experiencing homelessness must engage in to survive constitute cruel and unusual punishment and restrict fundamental civil liberties, such as free speech and privacy rights,” said Hillary Vedvig ’17, a student author of the report. “These laws are also enforced arbitrarily and discriminatorily against people experiencing homelessness as well as against people of color, transgender people, and people with disabilities living on the street.”

The report also demonstrates the ways in which local ordinances that criminalize homelessness are unnecessary, counterproductive, costly, and out of line with Connecticut values. “Enforcing laws that ban people from asking for money or lingering in a park square through unaffordable citations, or even arrest, does not address the root problems of homelessness,” said Nate Fox of the Warburton Resource, Outreach and Collaboration Center at Center Church in Hartford, who collaborated with the Clinic on this report. “Instead citations and arrests only make it harder to get back on your feet.”

“This report sheds light on a system that, through small actions by many actors, puts Connecticut’s most vulnerable people in a detrimental cycle of policing, homelessness, and poverty,” added Scout Katovich ’17, another student author of the report.

The report documents the harms people experiencing homelessness suffer at the hands of the criminal justice system every day. People interviewed for the report described receiving citations for loitering while waiting on the corner for a shelter to open. Just for asking for a few dollars, individuals face $99 fines under anti-panhandling ordinances, according to the report. Initial contact with the criminal justice system often escalates and results in a downward spiral, students said. If people are too poor to pay their fine, they must contest the ticket in court. But those interviewed for the report faced high barriers to showing up on their court date. For instance, many people never received notice of their court dates because they did not have an address or lacked transportation to get to court. Failure to pay the fine or go to court can result in arrest and incarceration, making it even more difficult to obtain housing and employment. In this way, the criminalization of homelessness further entrenches a cycle of homelessness, poverty, and criminalization, the report argues.

Even when they are not fined or arrested, Connecticut’s homeless are constantly told to move, resulting in a pervasive sense of insecruity, students said. As Thomas, a man interviewed for the report who has experienced homelessness in New Britain, remarked: “When they make all your activities illegal, then there’s nowhere for you to go.”

“If Connecticut is serious about criminal justice reform and eradicating homelessness, it must stop criminalizing homelessness,” said Allison Frankel ’17, another student author. “The Lowenstein Clinic urges Connecticut cities to immediately stop enforcing laws that criminalize homelessness and encourages state and local officials to focus on policies that will put people experiencing homelessness into housing, not handcuffs.”

The Allard K. Lowenstein International Human Rights Clinic is a legal clinic at Yale Law School that undertakes projects on behalf of human rights organizations and individual victims of human rights abuses.


On-line link

Full report:

Executive summary: