Homeless-aphobia at CruzioWorks in Santa Cruz

NOTE BY NORSE:   The toxic impact of targeting homeless people as a Public Safety Menace seems to have invaded CruzioWorks.  The management apparently cut off service to a homeless man and his son  several hours after he had paid $300+ for a 24-hour workspace to do computer work.  Apparently the cause was some paranoid worker in the building called the police, alarmed at the son’s standing next to the two pack-laden bicycles they had with them.

When HUFF members confronted the Cruzio management, they were unable or unwilling to give any description of a rule violated, of the “incident” they were concerned about, and had nothing to justify their position except that a worker had felt “uncomfortable” (this elevated to a “public safety” concern).

Given the kind of hysteria mounted by Take Back Santa Cruz, Mayor Bryant’s Public Hysteria Citizens Task Farce,  the Library’s new Security Guards/Sleeping Ban/No Signs policies, it’s not surprising, but deeply disturbing nonetheless.  The mere presence of homeless people in public (and now private spaces even for services paid for) is being viewed with prejudice and suspicion.

I urge people to come up and demand immediate end to this apparent groundless discrimination, prompted by anonymous complaint, or boycott the CruzioWorks.  We will be circulating a petition and literature there 1 PM to 3 PM.

https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2013/08/08/18741236.php

Title: Cruzio Works Bans Homeless Customer: Protest and Informational Picket
START DATE: Friday August 09
TIME: 1:00 PM – 3:00 PM
Location Details:
In front of Cruzio Works HQ in Downtown Santa Cruz at Church and Cedar Streets
Event Type: Other
Contact Name Robert Norse
Email Address rnorse3 [at] hotmail.com
Phone Number 831-423-4833
Address 309 Cedar PMB #14B Santa Cruz, CA 95060
The following is Dan Madison’s account of discrimination and contract breach at Cruzio Works.

Dan describes himself as a computer graphics designer with a 19-year old son. Both have disabilities and are homeless.

On Monday August 5, Dan Mattison reports he and his son Gryphon paid around $300 for a Cruzio sign-up and a Cruzio Works 24-hour workspace. He advised them that he was homeless and was told there would be no problem.

As Dan made financial arrangements, Gryphon watched the bikes, which also held their possessions, as they were temporarily parked in the storage area in the back of the Cruzio building.

At some point a woman who later turned out to be someone who worked in the building but not for Cruzio, demanded to know what they were doing there. Dan, went out to speak with her. He explained they were paying customers who had rented a 24-hour space but would be moving the bikes to a city bike storage locker (which he did shortly thereafter).

The woman said she’d already called the police and was concerned with “homeless junkies” being attracted to the area and that she had some issues with their being there at all. But her fears were apparently allayed by the fact that Dan was a paying patron of the business.

However later when Dan returned to get his key, a Cruzio employee (who refused to give her name or her superior’s name) told Dan that his membership was being revoked because of the woman’s apprehensions which she had read in an e-mail. She would not specify what particular behavior was of concern.

This is Dan’s account.

He came to a HUFF (Homeless United for Friendship & Freedom) meeting the next day and told us his story. We joined him in going to Cruzio to ask their side of the story.
I was present for this meeting and an audio was made.

Another woman and an escort again refused to give any specific reason why his membership had been terminated (though she said they would allow him a daytime membership on a “trial basis”). She did mention that they had a “community” there whose “safety” and “comfort” was of primary concern. She would not give any policy or act that suggested there was any violation of a rule that justified either calling the police or terminating his 24-hour membership.

HUFF members conferred outside and decided it sounded like anti-homeless discrimination. We will be setting up Cafe HUFF–an informational table with coffee to seek further information and to inform the community of what appears to be a rather sinister kind of backroom bigotry which is impacting a work-seeking homeless person, who has paid his bill.

We will be demanding that Cruzio Works restore Dan’s contract, issue a non-discrimination pledge, and further survey folks about their experiences with Cruzio Works.

Some HUFF members are pressing for a boycott of Cruzio Works (though not necessarily of Cruzio, the internet service).

The recorded interchange between Dan and the Cruzio rep on 8-7 is difficult to hear but somewhat illuminating in that Cruzio refuses to specify what rule was broken, what the complaint by a third party was, and what the “incident” consisted of.

INTERVIEW WITH DAN AND HIS SON GRYPHON ON FREE RADIO SANTA CRUZ: http://www.radiolibre.org/brb/brb130808.mp3

COME CHECK OUT THE PROTEST AND SHARE A CUP OF COFFEE ON FRIDAY TO FIND OUT FOR YOURSELF !

HUFF opposes passage of Palo Alto’s Living in Vehicles ordinance

FROM: Homeless United for Friendship & Freedom

309 Cedar St. PMB 14B

Santa Cruz, Ca. 95060

TO: Palo Alto City Council
250 Hamilton Avenue
Palo Alto, CA

re: Item # 17 on Action Agenda for Aug 5 2013 meeting

MC 9.06.010 “Living in Vehicles” ordinance proposal Continue reading

Blasting Back at the Cold of Deputy Property Seizure Against the Homeless in Santa Cruz

‘Black Bloc’ Action at Gov. Center Calls Attention to Police Seizure of Homeless Property
by Alex Darocy ( alex [at] alexdarocy.com)Monday Jul 8th, 2013 5:06 PM

On July 3, an activist served representatives of the Santa Cruz County government with a written notice stating that the Sheriff department’s policy of seizing Continue reading

Time to Chalk-ccupy Santa Cruz to Free the SC-11?

NOTE BY NORSE:  Unfortunately, the decision was made by a jury and doesn’t stop future prosecution as a “legal” matter.  However the voice of the people (as it’s been heard in Brazil, Turkey, and Egypt recently) –in this case through the jury acquittal via “jury nullification”–is louder than any judge, mayor, cop, or soldier.   It’s probably too much to hope that gentrified Santa Cruz juries will exercise the kind of independence, clear vision, and refusal to follow judicial authoritarianism that “conservative” San Diego jurors did.   Still, we can spread the word!

In Santa Cruz we have the recent imposition of curfews (Cowell’s Beach, the library, City Hall the County Building, the Levee, and now at Capitola Beach for the 4th of July) and piling on of cops and security guard patrols for “safety”.

Santa Cruz has a nasty history (in spite of its phony liberal reputation) if attacks on Free Speech.  As of 7-11, it will become illegal to hold up a political sign on any median or roundabout (the goal being to criminalize peaceful panhandling–again under the phony pretext of “Public Safety”).   Haughty bigots will have an additional weapon in the new “disorderly conduct” law making it illegal to make the gentry “uncomfortable” in the parks (which is a huge swath of territory extending far beyond formal parks run by the city’s Parks and Recreation Dept.)–violaters (as of July 11th) face up to a year in jail and $1000 fine if they dare to dispute officials and don’t leave areas for 24-hours as well as appear in court to face trial.

No cheeky chalker protesters were ticketed or cited for chalking during the Occupy movement (the cops simply used massive police force to terrorize both activists and homeless survival campers nearby).  However, the Santa Cruz City Attorney’s office has intervened against past anti-war protests to prosecute “criminal chalkers” such as activist Becky Johnson (see http://www.counterpunch.org/2003/02/22/hopscotch-rebellion ).

And D.A. Bob Lee is still postponing murder, rape and assault prosecutions to forward his Wells Fargo-friendly political agenda of trying four activists (the last of the Santa Cruz Eleven) for peaceful occupation of a 5-year vacant bank building at 75 River St.    (See http://66.147.242.176/~santacv5/santacruzelevencom/ for background on the SC-11).

He panhandled the Board of Supervisors last month for more money, while ignoring the hundred thousand-plus his malicious prosecution of the SC-11 has cost the county.  The four defendants go to trial in September and face 4 years in prison and thousands of dollars in fines and restitution though no evidence has been presented that any of them committed any kind of vandalism whatsoever, simply being present in the vacant building as hundreds were throughout the 3-day occupation.

It’s telling that for the first time in Santa Cruz history (as far as I’ve heard), a local judge fined the D.A.’s office for improper behavior involving D.A. Rebekah Young—Lee’s underling in charge of prosecuting the cases–for repeatedly withholding discovery and presenting falsehoods to the court and to the defendants.  (This cost the defendants and their lawyers tens of thousands of dollars as well as big court costs, but Judge Burdick, closing ranks with fellow attorneys, only fined Lee $500.  Lee has refused to pay and is appealing the case.)  See “Attorneys for 4 of the Santa Cruz 11 go to Status & Sanctions Hearing Monday” at https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2013/04/05/18734749.php )

Joe Schultz of India Joze will be catering a benefit for the SC-11 and Sanctuary Camp at 535 Spring St. 2-5 PM on Friday, July 5th.  Remember to carry chalk at all times!

Jeff Olson Acquitted Of Charges From Writing In Chalk On San Diego Sidewalk

By ELLIOT SPAGAT 07/02/13 09:40 AM ET EDT AP
https://bay165.mail.live.com/#!/!n=1602386955&view=1
jeff olson san diego chalk

SAN DIEGO — The mayor called the case “stupid” and a jury swiftly said it shouldn’t stick, taking the eraser to vandalism charges for a man who wrote anti-bank slogans on San Diego sidewalks.

A Superior Court jury deliberated for five hours after a four-day trial before acquitting Jeff Olson Monday of the 13 misdemeanor charges that could have brought 13 years in jail and $13,000 in fines.

Olson, 40, was charged with scrawling messages like “Shame on B of A” and `’No thanks, big banks” in water-soluble chalk on sidewalks outside San Diego Bank of America branches from April to August 2012. He included a drawing of an octopus reaching for dollar bills.
Olson turned to his attorney, nodded and smiled as the verdicts were read.

The trial was the latest in a series of dustups between City Attorney Jan Goldsmith, who prosecuted the case, and Mayor Bob Filner, who called it a “nonsense prosecution” that came in response to complaints from Bank of America.
“It’s washable chalk, it’s political slogans,” Filner said last week. “I think it’s a stupid case. It’s costing us money.”

Jail time is highly unusual for graffiti convictions, which typically result in fines or community service.

The city attorney’s office said it offered to reduce the charges if Olson agreed to perform community service by cleaning up graffiti, but he refused. The office said the case was referred by the police department.

“Graffiti remains vandalism in the state of California,” the city attorney’s office said. “Under the law, there is no First Amendment right to deface property, even if the writing is easily removed, whether the message is aimed at banks or any other person or group. We are, however, sympathetic to the strong public reaction to this case and the jury’s message.”

The judge, who imposed a gag order on participants during the trial, refused to allow Olson’s attorney to argue that the messages were constitutionally protected free speech. Instead, the attorney argued the messages caused no damage and were not malicious.

Olson, who was inspired by the Occupy Wall Street movement, said he was relieved by the outcome and that the prosecution brought more attention to his views than he ever imagined possible.

“I couldn’t have done better if I rented an airplane with a banner and put billboards up all over town,” he said.

MORE VIDEO AND COMMENTS AT

https://bay165.mail.live.com/#!/!n=1602386955&view=1

Three Fight-Back’s Against the Proposed Palo Alto Ban on Vehicle Homes

NOTE FROM NORSE:   While activists and social service providers (even the poverty pimps) gather to oppose the latest NIMBY attack on homeless-in-vehicles in Palo Alto, in Santa Cruz the corrupt and abusive law enforcement/towing company Combine continues to methodically destroy homeless Continue reading